Botswana · Tax regime
International Financial Services Centre
Active, contrary to a widespread belief that it was abolished after the OECD review. It was narrowed, not repealed: IFSC activities now carry a restricted definition framed 'having due regard to BEPS initiatives'. The current OECD Forum on Harmful Tax Practices classification could not be verified.
A functioning 15% regime in a politically stable, territorial-tax, non-CRS jurisdiction is a genuinely useful platform for regional financial activity — and it is more durable than its reputation suggests, having survived the OECD review by narrowing rather than closing.
Qualifying routes
15% on approved financial transactions with non-residents, IFSC companies and Specified Collective Investment Undertakings; 22% on other income
The facts
- Total landed cost
- No investment threshold; costs are substance and certification
- Timeline
- 3–12 months — certificate required; no dependable service standard
- Physical presence
- Corporate substance required
- Family
- not applicable — a corporate regime
- Permanent residency
- None — the IFSC has no residency component
- Citizenship
- None
- Language test
- not applicable
- Dual citizenship
- Not permitted — you would have to renounce
- Requirements
- IFSC certificateapproved financial services activitytransactions with non-residents or other IFSC entitiesBotswana substance
- The regime was narrowed after the OECD review and the qualifying activity definition is now restricted. Confirm your activity qualifies before building on it.
- We could not verify the current FHTP classification. Morocco and Tunisia both had regimes abolished outright in the same process — do not assume permanence.
- The 15% rate applies only to approved transactions with non-residents and other IFSC entities; everything else falls to 22%.
- Botswana's fiscal position is deteriorating and the February 2026 budget proposes raising corporate tax by 3 percentage points. Preferential regimes are the obvious next place to look for revenue.
- The separate SEZA regime (5% for 10 years, then 10%) is more generous but is also purely a tax regime with no residency component.